<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
Open full project

PAWS & PREEN PET SALON 1

PAWS & PREEN PET SALON 2

Chosen Device Sizes & Justification:

Mobile: 375px (iPhone SE)

Why: The most constrained screen size forces clean content prioritization. Pet owners frequently search and book appointments while mobile, making mobile-first design essential for conversion.

Tablet: 768px (iPad Portrait)

Why: Represents the mid-point between mobile and desktop. Allows testing of hybrid layouts and ensures the design works well on popular tablet devices used at home.

Desktop: 1440px

Why: 1440px is a common modern desktop resolution. The 1200px centered container prevents overly long text lines (improving readability) while maintaining consistent content width across large screens.

Grid System:

  • Mobile: 4 columns, 16px gutter, 20px margin
  • Tablet: 8 columns, 24px gutter, 40px margin
  • Desktop: 12 columns, 24px gutter, 120px margin (centered)

Responsive Adaptation

Key Decisions & Rationale:

Component | Mobile | Adaptation | Desktop | Adaptation | Reasoning
NavigationHamburger menu onlyFull visible navigationMobile: Reduces clutter. Desktop: Provides immediate access
Hero SectionStacked (text → image)Side-by-side (6-col text, 6-col image)Mobile: Ensures CTA is visible without scrolling. Desktop: Utilizes horizontal space efficiently
ServicesVertical list4-column gridMobile: Easy thumb scrolling. Desktop: Quick scanning comparison
Booking FormFull-width, simple 3 fieldsIntegrated with the trust signals sectionMobile: Reduces cognitive load. Desktop: Combines persuasion with action
TestimonialsSingle card with swipeCarousel showing 2-3 at onceMobile: Focused reading. Desktop: Social proof visibility

Visual Design System

  • Color Psychology: Teal (#2AA8A8) for trust/cleanliness, Apricot (#FFB347) exclusively for CTAs to drive action.
  • Typography: Poppins (friendly yet professional) for headings, Inter (highly readable) for body text.
  • Imagery: Contextual photos showing happy pets and professional grooming environments.
  • Accessibility: 44×44px minimum touch targets, WCAG AA contrast ratios maintained

ADDRESSING EVALUATION CRITERIA

Content (Criterion 1)

  • Purpose-Driven: Every section supports booking conversion (services → trust → 3-step booking form → Testimonial → Location → footer)
  • High Quality: Jargon-free copy, benefit-focused headlines, clear value proposition
  • Full Functionality: Complete information hierarchy (what, why, how, who, where) while maintaining focus

INFORMATION HIERARCHY BREAKDOWN:

1. WHAT? (The Offering)

What do you do? What services/products?

Our Answer: "Pet grooming services: Bath & Brush, Full Groom, Spa Package."

Where in design: Services section, clear headlines

2. WHY? (The Value/Problem Solved)

Why should I choose you? What problem do you solve?

Our Answer: "Stress-free grooming for anxious pets. Certified professionals, calming environment."

Where in design: Hero headline + value prop, Trust section

3. HOW? (The Process)

How does it work? How do I engage?

Our Answer: "Book online in 3 steps: Select service → Choose date → Phone number → Submit."

Where in design: Booking form, clear CTA path

4. WHO? (The Credibility)

Who are you? Why should I trust you?

Our Answer: "10+ certified groomers, 4.9★ rating, fear-free certified"

Where in design: Trust badges, testimonials with real names

5. WHERE/WHEN? (The Logistics)

Where are you? When are you open?

Our Answer: "77 Fluffytail Lane, Harmony, CA 93001, Mon-Fri 8 am-6 pm, Sat 9 am-4 pm"

Where in design: Location section, footer contact info

Usability (Criterion 2)

  • Safety: Form includes only essential fields, transparent pricing in the service dropdown
  • Effectiveness: Booking path requires minimal steps (3 fields → submit)
  • Efficiency: Critical actions (booking) accessible within 2 taps/clicks
  • Enjoyable: Calming color palette, happy pet imagery, clear progress indicators

Visual Design (Criterion 3)

  • Color Strategy: Teal establishes brand trust, apricot directs to conversion points
  • Typography Hierarchy: Clear heading levels, comfortable reading line lengths
  • Imagery: Supports content (happy pets = positive outcomes), not decorative
  • Consistency: Design system applied uniformly across all breakpoints

Presentation (Criterion 4)

  • Templates Used: Desktop design presented in the provided Uxcel template format
  • Formatting: Clear section headers, consistent spacing, professional typography
  • Rationale: This document provides explicit reasoning for every design decision.

For the header/Navigation, I chose a minimal approach that only includes the key link needed.

1. Services is the only secondary page users might need

2. BOOK NOW is the primary action

3. Contact, Location, Reviews** are all on the landing page already (as sections)

4. Follows best practice: "Remove navigation that doesn't support conversion."

ITERATION: Navigation Approach

Version 1: Full navigation (Home, Services, About, Contact, Book)

Problem: Too cluttered for landing page

Version 2 (Final): Minimal (Logo, Services, Book Now)

Why: Follows landing page best practices, reduces distraction

Here's the link to the full case study: https://www.behance.net/gallery/241372535/Paws-Preen-Responsive-Pet-Salon-Landing-Page

Share your insights — leave a project review and help others grow their skills

Reviews

1 review


Good start, good job talking about your process. However, I would prefer if you would show more of the process / deliverables alongside talking about them. Show sketches, ideation, etc. in the case study to demonstrate process and show the design system you created as well. Also, in your view full project, a lot of your designs are cut off in the mobile view, only showing the bottom of the design and only seeing a portion of the desktop design on a mobile mockup.

Keep going! This just needs some more polish before you consider it a solid part of your portfolio.

Hi Mindy Kilgore, Thank you for taking the time to review my work and for the specific suggestion to show more process. That was exactly the push I needed! Based on your feedback, I've enhanced the case study with: Process Visibility: - Included low-to-high fidelity wireframe progression - Documented the responsive grid system decision-making Design System Documentation: - Color palette with psychological rationale - Typography hierarchy and pairing decisions Iteration Examples: - Navigation simplification journey - CTA strategy evolution: CTAs used the same styles throughout the website. This promotes visual hierachy and coherence. The project now better reflects the systematic thinking behind the final designs. I appreciate you helping me elevate this to portfolio-ready standard! Updated Project: https://www.behance.net/gallery/241372535/Paws-Preen-Responsive-Pet-Salon-Landing-Page
(edited)

2 Claps
Average 2.0 by 1 person
5 claps
4 claps
3 claps
2 claps
1 claps
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>