Beautiful Solon Website

I feel like this is a missed opportunity, Rishi 😆 You should’ve led your project thumbnail with the header section of your design, that way it would really anchor the project title “Beautiful …” with the representative image. Compared to the one you’re using now, the corporate blue pricing page feels less connected.

There’s also a mismatch between the project brief (design a mobile onboarding flow) and the uploaded project (a salon website). It’s okay, it happens sometimes, so let’s just look at what’s here and review it.

Structurally it’s based on a well-laid-out design. The idea is that if anyone uses this skeleton, at least 60% of the result would look beautiful. But it still depends on how someone builds it out in completion, with the whole font pairing, colors, and imagery.

I’d say your design is rich, maybe too rich. Almost every element can stand on its own without the others, and that creates rivalry for attention when what we need is harmony. Take the logo for example: I see four typefaces, an illustration, and extra sprinkled (literally) aesthetic elements. Usually people go with simpler combinations for easier brand recall and to make the design blend better with its surroundings, like when it’s used on a website.

Another area to look at is the use of shapes. The ellipse isn’t a common choice for a slider carousel (circle is standard), and the way the other elements are arranged could be polished further. The colors sometimes compete with each other when they could instead complement one another.

You’ve got strong ingredients here, but it’s about refining them so they work together rather than competing. I’d love to see a simpler, more harmonious version of this, it could really shine.