Nice. Underwear.
1. Accessibility & Navigation
Decisions
• Large, readable base font for comfortable scanning.
• Integrated microphone icon for voice search, supporting multilingual users and people with motor or cognitive limitations.
• High-contrast color system to meet accessibility standards.
Rationale
The goal is to remove barriers. Clear typography, voice input, and verified contrast create an interface that works for more people.
2. Visual Inclusivity
Decisions
• Imagery features people of mixed body shapes, skin tones, and styles.
• Photos avoid gendered aesthetics and follow a soft, neutral palette.
Rationale
Representation is delivered visually, without forcing identity labels.
3. Category Structure: Shop by Body Need
Decisions
• No “Men” or “Women” sections.
• Product discovery organized by functional needs:
– Tops
– Everyday underwear
– Period-friendly options
– Pregnancy-supportive fits
– Sensitive-skin fabrics
– Support and compression styles
Rationale
Including users who may be pregnant or menstruating but don’t identify with traditional categories. It avoids misgendering and reduces friction by focusing on the body, not assumptions.
4. Sustainable Value Proposition
Decisions
• Education around natural fibers like heavy organic cotton, recycled silk alternatives, and plant-based textiles.
• Transparent breakdown of materials, origin, and environmental footprint.
Rationale
Sustainability becomes a lived experience, not a marketing sticker. Users understand what they’re buying, why it matters, and how it impacts the planet.
5. Articles & Learning Hub: Circular Economy
Decisions
• Short, accessible articles explaining circularity, textile recycling, quality over quantity, and garment care.
Rationale
The brand positions itself as a trustworthy guide in sustainable fashion, not just a seller of products.
6. Aesthetic Direction
Decisions
• Neutral colors applicable to all genders.
• Minimal, soft layouts.
• Clean, naturalized product photography.
Rationale
Neutral tones and soft visuals reinforce the brand’s inclusive and sustainable ethos. The design avoids signaling who “should” wear what.
7. Overall Experience Philosophy
Decisions
• Build an interface that respects people’s bodies without labeling them.
• Make sustainability understandable and transparent.
• Prioritize accessibility from the first pixel.
Rationale
This project reframes underwear shopping as a safe, educational, and human-centered experience.
Project link
Tools used
From brief
Topics
Share
Reviews
2 reviews
Hey Martina, really "Nice" work! *pun intended* 😅
I liked how you explained your design rationale. The UI looks simple, minimalistic, on point, clean & trustworthy. I also looked at your Figma file and was impressed to see how you took inspiration also into consideration, from multiple sources.
Only one thing I am wondering in relation to UI choices is why you chose to put "+5" so far away from the colors in a product card. When seeing that it felt weird to me, I was expecting it to be close to the colors since I understand it says there are 5 more colors available.
I think the design overall is accessible and inclusive. Only thing I am wondering (and maybe in real life scenarios would require some user testing) is if men or women could get frustrated looking for something right for them, while having to navigate through all "underwear" category which includes products for all people, regardless how they identify, as you mentioned, since you removed traditional "men/women" categories in your website information architecture.
Really nice work! Keep creating and being awesome!
look good! I like it.
You might also like

Portfolio

Workalot Color System

UX Case Study • E-commerce

Food Item Checkout Mobile UI

TaskFlow Accessible Login & Signup










