<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

In this project, I chose Trello as SaaS platform and analyzed its Sign Up page. My redesign focused on both the visual design and the accessibility of texts, inputs, and buttons. Additionally, I aimed to make this page more useful, as it usually presents only the form in an empty space lacking personality.

Trello is a web-based project management and collaboration tool that helps individuals and teams organize tasks, projects, and workflows visually. Users can create boards to represent projects, lists within boards to represent stages or categories, and cards within lists to represent tasks. Cards can include checklists, due dates, attachments, labels, comments, and other metadata, making it easy to track progress and collaborate. Trello is especially popular for its flexibility, simplicity, and visual “Kanban-style” interface.

Trello uses an Atlassian account, the same account system used for other Atlassian products like Jira, Confluence, Bitbucket, and more. This allows users to access multiple tools with a single login, share information seamlessly across products, and leverage integrations within the Atlassian ecosystem. For example, you can link Trello cards to Jira issues or Confluence pages to centralize project documentation and development workflows.

Trello Sign Up Accessible Page 1

In the image above, the points where I identified issues are listed:

  1. Missing checkbox: It is always better to include a checkbox for accepting the Terms and Privacy Policy.
  2. Small and insignificant title: Since this is an Atlassian account, it would be better to indicate it immediately. Additionally, the title should be larger as it should be the first in the page’s hierarchy.
  3. Missing label: It is good practice to always have a fixed label that communicates the purpose of the related input, also for accessibility reasons, especially since the placeholder has too low contrast.
  4. All choices look the same: When adding other sign-in options through common services like Google, Microsoft, Apple, etc., the most commonly used ones should be visually prioritized to avoid choice overload.
  5. Unnecessary shadow: Every visual element has a purpose. In this case, the shadow is unnecessary because it does not signify anything other than grouping information. Usually, this type of shadow is used to indicate a clickable element, which this is clearly not.
  6. Unnecessary decorative elements: Using illustrations without text or titles that indicate their meaning serves only as filler and could be done better.

Trello Sign Up Accessible Page 2

The new Sign Up page is structured with a layout that balances the form on the right with a feature discovery section on the left, and The functions scroll automatically over time. The title, texts, and images were taken from the official landing page. In addition to addressing the issues mentioned earlier, I increased the contrast for inputs and buttons to 3:1, while small text now has a contrast above 4.5:1. I reduced the prominence of the logo by using only the pictogram, while giving more importance to the title, making it clear that this is an Atlassian account. I chose to place the email sign-up first before other services, as this is likely Atlassian’s intended flow, and the title references sign-up via email. Finally, the text in the checkbox was also simplified to make it understandable for everyone.

Share your insights — leave a project review and help others grow their skills

Reviews

5 reviews


Hi Andrea,

Your work is impressive.

Firstly, you start with usability evaluation of the original design. You pinpoint the improvement areas in particular from accessibility perspectives. Then, you present your design solutions accordingly.

Secondly, you make good use the left panel to claim the value proposition of Trello, engaging potential new users. Surely, the left panel content could be dynamic according to product marketing needs. Awesome SaaS app design consideration!

Only one mild issue: this is a LogIn page, so the primary hero of the page should the LogIn UI itself. If the left panel content visual is a bit more moderate, e.g. colors less vibrant, text less, the LogIn focus would be more enhanced.

All in all, your design is well-considerate.


Hello Andrea,

This is such a nice piece of work! I really like how you spotted the accessibility issues and explained them in a clear and simple way — that shows great awareness and attention to detail. Balancing good visuals with inclusivity is not easy, but you’ve handled it very thoughtfully here. Well done!


Hi✨

This is a fantastic and incredibly thorough project. You went beyond a simple redesign to perform a true UX audit of a major platform, which is a sign of a very strong designer.

You did a great job identifying key issues and creating a solution that is both visually appealing and strategically smarter. I especially love how you added a feature discovery section to what was a very simple page, making it more useful and engaging. Well done!


Hey Andrea! Great work! You tackled key accessibility gaps like missing labels, low contrast, and small titles, and your fixed labels, improved contrast, and clearer terms checkbox make the form far more wcag compliant. Prioritizing email sign-up and visually differentiating social logins helps reduce choice overload, and the split layout with feature discovery is chef’s kiss. This approach would work brilliantly for most SaaS product sign-up pages — plenty of people still don’t fully know what a SaaS tool offers, so using this space to introduce features adds personality and purpose to what’s often an empty page.

A few tweaks could make it even stronger: keep motion in the left panel subtle or user-controlled, ensure the brand logo remains visible enough for recall, and streamline the left-side copy so it doesn’t compete with the form. Also, while prioritizing email makes sense, keeping “Continue with Google” slightly more prominent could help users who want the fastest login path.

Overall, I really appreciate these kinds of improvements that boost both usability and accessibility while giving the page a stronger first impression.


Really nice job highlighting Trello’s accessibility gaps and showing clear fixes — your analysis is sharp and easy to follow. One thing to watch is keeping the feature panel motion subtle so it doesn’t distract from the form. Overall, this redesign feels both more inclusive and more engaging — well done!


27 Claps
Average 4.5 by 6 people
5 claps
4 claps
3 claps
2 claps
1 claps
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>