<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
Open full project

Most coworking brands have the same problem:

acquisition is easy, retention isn't. The website sells a lifestyle. The product delivers a desk. When the gap between those two things hits on day one, the clock starts ticking on month-two cancellation. I wanted to follow that gap through the full customer journey, which is where this project started.

I built it around a fictional brand, NORTHSIDE, rather than a real one.

Using an actual brand (WeWork, Regus) means inheriting their baggage and working around whatever reputation they have right now. A fictional brand means every decision is yours. NORTHSIDE is positioned as a boutique space for solo founders, not a corporate-first operator, which gave the persona real emotional stakes. Someone betting their own productive time, not a company card.

The persona is Maya, a solo SaaS founder in Berlin.

The key thing about her: the decision is entirely hers. No committee, no approval process. One person, one frustration threshold. That keeps the touchpoint structure clean and the motivations readable at a glance.

NORTHSIDE - Coworking space Customer Journey Map 1

The map runs seven stages:

Awareness, Research, Trial visit, Sign-up, First day, Daily use, Renewal/Advocacy.

Most CJM templates stop at onboarding, which is the wrong place to stop for a subscription product.

The renewal is the business outcome. Daily use and Renewal are the hardest stages to speculate about without primary research, which is probably why most portfolio CJMs leave them blank.

I included them because skipping them would have made the map look thorough without being useful.

Each stage maps across seven columns: user actions, touchpoints, thoughts, emotions, pain points, opportunities, and KPIs. The KPI column was the one I nearly cut it can feel out of place in a service design context.

NORTHSIDE - Coworking space Customer Journey Map 2

I kept it because it enforces a specific discipline: if you can't name the metric that changes when you fix a pain point, you probably haven't diagnosed the actual problem.

Visually, the goal was a map a senior stakeholder could scan in 90 seconds. Fewer words per cell, wider gutters, a color system that carries information instead of decorating it. Terra Cotta goes only on pain-point cells. Plex Blue goes only on opportunities. Nothing else gets color. The emotion sparkline above the grid is a small line chart plotting the emotional arc before you read a single cell. It gives the reader orientation without taking up space.

The case study runs to eleven sections because the map alone doesn't show the thinking behind it. The competitor matrix (NORTHSIDE against WeWork, Workbar, CO+HOOTS) explains the positioning gap I was designing for. The roadmap and opportunity sections show what I'd do with what the map found.

One caveat I kept visible in the case study:

the emotion curve is extrapolated from secondary research, not primary interviews.

NORTHSIDE - Coworking space Customer Journey Map 3

With real access I'd run five or six conversations focused specifically on the renewal moment -- what made someone stay, what made them cancel. That's the data that would sharpen the later-stage cells considerably.

Share your insights — leave a project review and help others grow their skills

Reviews

1 review


JB, Amazing work!

I'm really impressed with the depth and planning for the Customer Journey Mapping. I appreciate your honesty around the research you conducted and what you'd love to explore further. The case study was a really interesting read and I could clearly see your thinking.

The named host ritual and transparent pricing were made a lot of sense — as someone who books coworking spaces, nothing is more annoying than having to call or guess the price.

A few thoughts:

  • If you were to conduct interviews I'd be very interested in the month-end recap. We know founders are busy, will they want all that extra detail or just a straight to the point email with the invoice? Privacy also comes to mind here, some founders may feel uncomfortable about people checking their desk.
  • I feel splitting the call room into 30 min slots could cause friction. What if a founder has a longer meeting during peak? What if a meeting runs over? 30 minutes isn't very long to set up, have a call and leave, and with a higher price tag this may feel restrictive. Another thing worth asking about!
  • Privacy could also be a potential selling point. Founders may be dealing with contracts, pitch decks etc. Blockers between desks, frosted glass call rooms, private networks could build trust.

Just a few thoughts really, a small bit on assumptions or further things you'd dig into in interviews would really stand out. Overall though, I love the way you've laid this out, the thought that's gone into the project and the honesty around research.

Great stuff!


5 Claps
Average 5.0 by 1 person
5 claps
4 claps
3 claps
2 claps
1 claps
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>