Dark Pattern
Dark patterns are deceptive design choices that manipulate users into actions they might not otherwise take, undermining trust and harming user experience.

Dark patterns are user interface designs intentionally crafted to trick or nudge people into doing things that serve the business but not the user. They exploit cognitive biases and take advantage of how people interact with digital systems. A common example is hiding the unsubscribe button in an email footer while making the subscribe button prominent, or using confusing wording to push users into sharing more data than they intended.
In UX design, dark patterns represent the opposite of user-centered thinking. Instead of helping people achieve their goals, these patterns prioritize short-term business gains like higher conversions or sign-ups. The result may look successful in metrics initially, but over time it erodes trust. Customers may leave a service entirely when they feel manipulated, which creates long-term damage to brand reputation.
Product management also intersects with this concept. While growth goals often push teams to maximize engagement or sales, the ethical boundary lies in how these goals are pursued. Relying on dark patterns can make numbers look good in the short run but usually backfires.
Companies like LinkedIn, Facebook, and Amazon have faced criticism for patterns like forced continuity, hidden fees, or confusing opt-out flows, leading to regulatory scrutiny and reputational risk.
There are many types of dark patterns. “Roach motel” designs make it easy to sign up but very difficult to leave. “Confirmshaming” uses guilt-tripping language to discourage declining an offer. “Sneak into basket” adds items without clear consent. “Bait and switch” promises one outcome but delivers another. Each of these manipulates user decisions rather than empowering them.
Real-world examples show how destructive dark patterns can be. Social media platforms have used infinite scroll to keep users engaged beyond their intention, leading to criticism about addictive behavior. Some airlines have added hidden fees late in the booking process, frustrating customers and sparking lawsuits. These cases highlight how design decisions that exploit attention or mislead users eventually damage trust in the brand.
Learn more about this in the 14 Design Dark Patterns You'll Want to Avoid Lesson.
Key Takeaways
- Dark patterns are manipulative design choices that prioritize business over user needs.
- Common examples include confirmshaming, bait and switch, and hidden fees.
- They create short-term gains but long-term trust and legal problems.
- Product managers must balance growth with ethical responsibility.
Recommended resources
Courses
Mentorship Mastery
Design Thinking
Workshop Facilitation
Service Design
Leadership Mastery
Product Discovery

Cross-Functional Design & Product Teams
Product Analytics
AI Fundamentals for UX
Introduction to Product Management
Introduction to Design Audits
KPIs & OKRs for Products
AI Prompts Foundations
Building Agile Teams
Government Design Foundations
Lessons
Exercises
Tutorials

Mastering Elevation for Dark UI: A Comprehensive Guide

Creating Reusable Components in Figma: A Step-by-Step Tutorial

14 Dark Patterns Examples in Design You’ll Want to Avoid
Projects

Ecochic - Ethical and Inclusive E-Commerce

Redesigning a Dark Pattern

Sublee

Movie streaming App

Redesigning a Dark Pattern
FAQs
A design pattern is considered dark when it misleads or manipulates users into choices they would not normally make. The difference from a persuasive design lies in intention and clarity. Ethical design helps users understand their options, while dark design intentionally hides, obscures, or pressures decisions.
Designers must evaluate whether an interface empowers users or restricts them. If the goal is to confuse or coerce, it falls under dark patterns. Transparency and respect for user autonomy mark the dividing line.
Dark patterns might boost short-term numbers like sign-ups or sales, but they create resentment when users realize they have been manipulated. This erosion of trust leads to higher churn, negative reviews, and reputational damage. In the long run, the cost of regaining trust is far greater than the temporary gains.
Businesses that rely on dark patterns also face regulatory risks. Laws are increasingly holding companies accountable for deceptive practices, which can lead to fines or mandatory changes. Sustainable growth relies on honest and transparent design, not manipulation.
Teams can avoid dark patterns by embedding ethics into the design process. This means prioritizing user goals alongside business goals and reviewing designs for clarity and fairness. User testing can help uncover whether people feel misled or confused, serving as a safeguard against unintentional dark practices.
Product managers and designers should also establish internal guidelines. A clear framework for ethical decision-making ensures that designs are persuasive without crossing into manipulation. By building trust instead of exploiting it, teams create products that people value and return to.