Prioritizing essential features over nice-to-haves

A common mistake in MVP design is trying to add too many features at once. The goal is not to build a complete product, but to test the smallest set of functions that deliver value. This requires a careful process of prioritization. Teams list potential features, then separate the “must-haves” from the “nice-to-haves.”

The must-haves are the ones directly linked to the problem and value proposition. For example, if the MVP is for file sharing, the ability to upload and download is essential, while folders or tagging can wait. Nice-to-haves are not discarded forever, but postponed until the core assumptions are validated. In the file-sharing example, features such as advanced search, custom folder structures, or integration with cloud storage services could all be considered nice-to-haves.

Prioritization prevents wasted resources and shortens development time. It also makes testing clearer, because users can focus on the essential function. The art of MVP design is not in how much is included, but in how much is left out.