Committing to one framework in practice

Introducing a framework is only the first step. Its value emerges when teams commit to using it consistently, even when debates are intense or deadlines are pressing. Switching between methods or applying them selectively can create confusion and weaken trust in the process. For example, if a team uses RICE for some decisions but reverts to intuition when results are inconvenient, the framework loses credibility. Commitment means applying the chosen method to all initiatives within its scope and revisiting it only when business goals or circumstances change.

Consistency also builds shared understanding. Over time, stakeholders become familiar with the framework’s language, whether it is Must Have or Delighter, and this reduces friction in discussions. Regular reviews ensure the framework stays relevant, since priorities evolve with the market and the product. Committing does not mean rigidity. It means using the framework as the baseline for structured decisions, while allowing space for thoughtful adjustments when evidence justifies them. This balance of discipline and flexibility ensures that prioritization serves both strategy and execution.