Geometric Perception and Design Composition

Understand the way different shapes are perceived and how they can influence user behavior
Geometric Perception and Design Composition Lesson

The way users perceive different geometric shapes and their properties can have a profound effect on your compositions. Which shapes attract the most attention? Why do some designs — just like some smells — make users feel uncomfortable? What makes users group some elements together and not others? 

Understanding the way different shapes are perceived and how they can influence user behavior is vital to designing effective compositions. Pay attention to things like shape, color, and grouping when creating UI designs.

An element's shape is one of the first things we notice. Primitive shapes are found everywhere around us, in both natural and manmade objects, in all different sizes and configurations. Shapes are recognizable at a glance and, in design especially, users can often immediately identify common components by shape alone.

Active shapes

Active shapes are those that attract and keep our attention. Shapes with rounded edges, such as circles or many organic and abstract shapes, are perceived by users as more active. Those with straight lines and right angles, such as squares and rectangles, are more passive.

Passive shapes

Passive shapes are the opposite of active ones — they lurk in the background and stay out of the limelight. Most geometric shapes are passive. Squares are considerably less engaging than circles or organic shapes. They feel deeply grounded in their surroundings — think of how much more difficult it is to move a square, angular object than it is to move a round one. Squares produce the impression of stability and firmness.

Stable shapes

Subconsciously, we compare design elements to real-world objects. Stable shapes are those that we perceive as well-grounded and difficult to topple. A triangle is a versatile shape — it can be either stable or unstable, depending on which direction it's pointing. A triangle pointing up looks solid and well-balanced — it would be difficult to tip over — similar to a pyramid in the physical world.

Unstable shapes

Unstable shapes look like they’re about to tip over. They can give users an uneasy, and even uncomfortable, feeling. A downward-pointing triangle is one such example. In the real world, it would be difficult to balance such a shape so it would stay upright. The same goes for rhombuses or squares rotated to stand on one corner.

Organic shapes

Organic shapes resemble shapes you’d find in nature — leaves, clouds, flowers, and the like. They’re irregular and often asymmetric.[1] Depending on how they’re used, organic shapes can appear more active than most geometric shapes due to their fluid lines or they can be made to blend into their surroundings.

Grouping

Our brain has a perception threshold — it can’t simultaneously perceive more than 7 elements at once. When there’s more, we automatically try to organize and group elements similar in size, shape, or color. If there are too many diverse elements, the composition seems fragmented and incomplete. This is why it’s important to consider how elements are grouped when creating a composition.

Grouping by size Bad Practice
Grouping by size Best Practice

Objects with similar sizes are perceived to be related to one another — they form a group. Elements that are larger or smaller than those in a group will stand apart, which can be used to your advantage. But if you want certain elements to be perceived as related, ensure they’re of similar size.

Grouping by shape Bad Practice
Grouping by shape Best Practice

Shape can help differentiate between groups of objects that are of similar sizes. For example, in a composition that includes both circles and squares, users will perceive the circles as one group and the squares as another group. 

Grouping by color Bad Practice
Grouping by color Best Practice

We perceive elements of the same color as belonging together. For example, if you line up 5 white dogs and 1 white cat, at first glance, most people would see 6 white dogs. That’s the power color can have over perception. Use color wisely to group elements together, even when they have disparate shapes or sizes.

Grouping by proximity Bad Practice
Grouping by proximity Best Practice

One effective way of grouping objects is to put them in close proximity to each other.[2] Just like a long queue to get into a nightclub, closely positioned elements are often viewed as one, even if they’re different sizes, shapes, and colors.

Grouping by spatial orientation Bad Practice
Grouping by spatial orientation Best Practice

Objects facing the same direction are naturally perceived as related. Like a crowd facing the stage at a concert, they appear as a single group. In contrast, objects facing various directions, such as people scattered around a park looking in different directions, are perceived as separate and unrelated.

Grouping by movement direction  Bad Practice
Grouping by movement direction  Best Practice

Elements moving in the same direction look more uniform and closely related than those moving randomly. Think of how the German Autobahn’s traffic looks more structured than chaotic traffic in India or Southeast Asia.

Complete the lesson quiz and track your learning progress.
Start
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>